August 2005 Archives

An Interruption, a Farewell

I'm leaving Minnesota and moving to Michigan next week. I'll be starting school at the Univeristy of Michigan School of Information.

To all the people I've worked with at Merrill Corporation during the past six years, thank you. It's been fun getting to know all of you and the quirks of Merrill. Best of luck to all your future endeavors, personal and professional.

In the meantime there won't be any activity on this site for a few weeks while I get settled in and decide on how the site should change or stay the same in the future.

Delusions of Ash: Reflections on Hiroshima

There is nothing of greatness about the United States that is not also the greatness of all human beings. Everyone who lives or dies in this world is entitled to the same respect, the same rights, as those whom chance has allowed to be born in the United States. To imagine that we are above humanity, that we are the greatest nation that has ever existed, is ultimate hubris.

It is the hubris that allows us to torture others without complaint. It is the hubris that justifies our bombing civilians without objection. It is the hubris that will destroy us.

Today, on the sixtieth anniversary of Hiroshima, we should all reflect upon what we have done in the name of protecting our country in the past. Sixty years ago America unleashed upon the world the greatest destructive force ever created. A destructive force that makes no distinctions between civilians and soldiers, between innocents and guilty. It is our solemn responsibiltiy to prevent such tragedies from occurring from now until the end of history. It is a burden we can never forget.

There are many people who justify the use of the atmoic bomb upon Japan because they believe it was the only way to prevent the greater killing that would have been the result of an invasion. I ask them to consider the opposite hypothetical: if Japan had won the war and had chosen to drop two bombs on America in order to end the war from the air instead of through an ivasion of American soil, what would we say today? Would we still be so willing to praise the decision because it had saved the lives of many more millions who might have died during an invasion of the U.S.?

There are many issues involved in the contemplation of the atomic bomb: justification, regret, exceptionalism, and more. Saving many more lives by dropping the bomb may have been a unavoidable trade-off. But to make an exception for the United States to use the bomb to prevent further war should not limit us from praising the reverse condition. If we cannot imagine the end of the war with an atomic bomb on American soil then we cannot possibly say that we are solely interested in saving the maximum number of lives. A bit of American exceptionalism has entered our thinking.

The atomic bomb is also unique because it makes no distinctions between combatant and non-combatant. It kills those closest to the epicenter and then declines in lethality through distance from the epicenter. The atom bomb is the apotheosis of total warfare, the epitome of mechanical killing accomplished by humanity during the bloody twentieth-century. And it was America that chose to use it.

Some people may read the above and conclude that I am anti-American. Far from it. I value my right to speak my mind and share my thoughts. I value them enough to ask questions of our leaders, and to ask how much are we willing to lose in order to protect those freedoms. I think that is the pinnacle of patriotism.

A final two quotes from the end of “The Making of the Atomic Bomb” by Richard Rhodes

From Gil Elliot

By the time we reach the atom bomb, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the ease of access to target and the instant nature of macro-impact mean that both the choice of city and the identity of the victim has become completely randomized, and human technology has reached the final platform of self-destructiveness. The great cities of the dead, in numbers, remain Verdun, Leningrad, and Auschwitz. But at Hiroshima and Nagasaki the “city of the dead” is finally transformed from a metaphor into a literal reality. The city of the dead of the future is our city and it victims are -- not French and German soldiers, not Russian citizens, nor Jews -- but all of us without reference to specific identity.

From Michihiko Hachiya, recalling a dream

The night had been close with many mosquitoes. Consequently, I slept poorly and had a frightful dream. It seems I was in Tokyo after the great earthquake and around me were decomposing bodies heaped in piles, all of whom were looking right at me. I saw an eye sitting on the palm of a girl's hand. Suddenly it turned and leaped into the sky and then came flying back towards me, so that, looking up, I could see a great bare eyeball, bigger than life, hovering over my head, staring point blank at me. I was powerless to move.

Technorati tags: , , ,